Save Diageo Jobs in Scotland
Here is a short video with some of the Diageo workers from Port Dundas and Kilmarnock who lobbied the Scottish Parliament today to get behind the campaign to save their jobs. They were supported by MSPs of all parties:
News and Politics from Scotland
Here is a short video with some of the Diageo workers from Port Dundas and Kilmarnock who lobbied the Scottish Parliament today to get behind the campaign to save their jobs. They were supported by MSPs of all parties:
Earlier this week Kenny MacAskill defended his decision to release Abdelbaset Ali Al-Megrahi to fellow members of the Scottish Parliament. His primary defence was one of ‘due process’.
However, as the evidence unfolds it is becoming increasingly clear that the decision to release Mr Al-Megrahi has all the hallmarks of an irrational and ‘Wednesbury’ unreasonable decision for want of due process.
If there had been time, I believe both the decision to release, and the decision to allow Mr Al-Megrahi to return to Libya, could have been challenged on a petition for judicial review. Consider some of the facts we now know.
The decision to release Mr Al-Megrahi on compassionate grounds was made upon medical evidence that he had less than three months to live. This week it became apparent that four prostate cancer specialists refused to say that Mr Al-Megrahi had less than three months to live.
It is understood that the Justice Minister disregarded four expert opinions in preference to the judgment of a prison GP with little experience of prostate cancer. If that is correct, that in itself would have given grounds for challenge.
The decision authorising Mr Al-Megrahi’s return to Libya was made because remaining in Scotland was ruled out as ‘Clear advice from senior police officers [was] the security implications of such a move would be severe’. That advice became opaque this week as Strathclyde Police disclosed they had not been asked whether they could manage the security implications of trasferring Mr Al-Megrahi to a secure residence in Scotland. If they had been asked they could have done so.
I have already flagged up other major contradictions in Kenny MacAskill’s judgment in my The Firm blog earlier this week. The ‘due process’ defence - now threadbare – is looking ridiculous.
For example, Mr MacAskill’s visit to Greenock prison continues to be hailed as necessary under ‘due process’ of consideration of the prisoner transfer application. Yet that application should have been automatically rejected as premature under ‘due process’.
At the end of the day all that remains is a legally flawed decision made on the grounds of political expediency.
From time to time I intend to use this blog to publish articles, or extracts of Tom Johnston's journalism.
"It appears that not only the wicked but their descendants are allowed to flourish like the green bay tree. Here, in the Kers, we have the descendants of savage pirates, men who literally washed their hands in blood, men who stole without ceasing, and murdered without compunction, rewarded generation after generation with an annual payment of £145,554!"The founder of the Ker estates seems to have been a huntsman or forest-rover, who was taken under the patronage of the Douglases, and was, for some reason or other, given a charter of the lands of Altonburn and Nisbet. In 1451, James II gave the Kers the lands of Auldroxburgh "for payment of one silver penny at Whitsunday if demanded" and in 1488 James IV handed over "Roxburgh with its patronage of Maisondeau" for payment of "a red rose at the feet of St John the Baptist." It is well to have these accounts exact: they may be useful when the State demands restitution and the Duke makes an outcry for "compensation". The two supporters on the Roxburgh crest are "savages, each holding a beacon", and I can imagine nothing more appropriate, for with the Scotts and other robber clans, they were eternally at feud, and they carried their moonlighting and murdering right up to the streets of Edinburgh.""At the Reformation of Church plunder period, the Kers absorbed the whole of the great property of Kelso Abbey, miles and miles of rich lands, baronies, lordships, mills, patronages, everything they could lay their hands upon, and the sole excuse given for this shameless rapacity is that "Sir Robert Kerr of Cessford was a great favourite at Court." These estates are today enjoyed by Sir Robert Kerr's descendant, although we are told in Crawford's "Peerage", that the Kerrs were forced to hand back about 20 churches and their tithes to the Crown. The first Earl was Privy Seal to Charles I, was notorious for his cruelty, and was long remembered for his discgraceful betrayal of Montrose. They specialised in open rapine, these Kers."
It looks like the SNP might be about to lose another by-election candidate in Glasgow North East.
© Blogger templates Psi by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008
Back to TOP